ResourcesBlog
Non-standard products: A wasted source of value
Non-standard products: A wasted source of value
March 26, 2025
5 min

1. 🥕🍏Non-standard products in France: Rejected by large retailers

Imagine a field full of crooked carrots, apples that are too small or too large, tomatoes with slight irregularities... All just as tasty and nutritious as the standardized ones, yet they will never make it to supermarket shelves. Why? Because they do not fit into the strict standards imposed by large retailers.

This obsession with aesthetics has serious consequences for producers. What can they do with these rejected fruits and vegetables? Several options exist, but none are truly ideal:

This massive waste is absurd. According to ADEME, 10 million tons of food are wasted each year in France, with a significant share consisting of fruits and vegetables deemed "too imperfect" for supermarket shelves.

The Garot Law of 2016 attempted to address the issue by requiring supermarkets to donate their unsold food to charities. However, it does not directly tackle the problem of off-size products. Some initiatives exist, but they remain too marginal given the scale of food waste.

In summary, the Garot Law prohibits supermarkets larger than 400 m² from discarding edible food and requires them to sign agreements with charities to donate it. It establishes a hierarchy of actions against waste: prevention, donations, animal feed, and finally, energy recovery. The goal is to reduce food waste and help people in need. However, it only applies to large retailers, leaving significant losses at earlier stages of the supply chain.

2.🛒🍳 Emerging solutions, but still insufficient

Fortunately, some players refuse to give up and are exploring solutions to give these products a second life:

These initiatives show that another model is possible, but large-scale development requires collective mobilization and a real change in mindset.

3. 💡Towards a systematic revalorization of non-standard products

The way we look at fruits and vegetables must evolve. Accepting irregularly shaped products does not mean compromising on quality. On the contrary, it supports producers, reduces waste, and promotes more responsible consumption.

Some ideas to accelerate this transition:

By valuing these products instead of rejecting them, we can turn a problem into an opportunity. What is currently considered "waste" can become a valuable resource. It is an economic, ecological, and ethical challenge. And what if, instead of judging a tomato by its shape, we chose it for its taste?